Pop Astronaut

Genre

I’ve been thinking a lot about genre lately. In part, to defend my love of fantasy and science fiction from the nay-sayers, but mostly to figure out my own biases when I’m comparing fictions to one another. You might say, since I’m not a professional writer or literary critic, that I should just accept my own taste and stop wasting valuable brain waves on pseudo-intellectual masturbation, but I guess that’s what you get from a liberal arts education and an English teacher mother.

Anyway, Michael Chabon’s introduction to McSweeney’s Enchanted Chamber of Astonishing Stories is up front on his site and deals with this topic nicely.

In my opinion, genre is really just a marketing tool and an implicit judgement on a book’s quality made by a Barnes and Noble employee somewhere. In other words, who cares? Especially when William Gibson is relegated to the sci-fi ghetto, while Tom Clancy and his ilk hold a permanent place in the holy fiction section.

Organ (Michael Chabon’s web site) - Introduction to McSweeney’s Enchanted Chamber of Astonishing Stories

January 17th, 2006

3 Comments

  1. Gigi Says:

    I’m dealing with this issue right now for my chick lit article! The genre lables are so loaded (especially the likes of chick lit and something like sci-fi–so many cultural implications). It’s hard to separate understanding the genre from thinking about its label as a marketing tool. I must read he Chabon site!

  2. Astronaut Says:

    Gigi, I can’t wait to read your article! Be sure to send me a link when it’s up.

  3. Gigi Says:

    But of course!!

Leave a Reply

Comments RSS

About

Daily thoughts and links from Joe Eastham, writing from the frozen wastes of the Pacific Northwest. Contact me via astronaut at popastronaut dot net.

Subscribe

RSS | RSS - Comments